... all came together for me yesterday.
And in case you're wondering,
no! I mean all of this conceptually...
Although I will admit that the pie part was not conceptual.
Okay, you see, I'm on my way to the Seminary campus to return a couple of library books (that I actually finished. woo! I love recreational reading!), one of which was "Sex and the Soul". And as I'm driving there, I'm listening to an NPR program talking about the financial bailout and all the greed on Wall St.
Then, I get to Sem and, what's this?
A Pie Social for Thanksgiving week? You don't say! ;)
How fortuitous for me that I happen to be on vacation and can get there during the day and I happened to finish up my library books just in time for the pie soci.., I mean before the library closed for the holiday and all...
So I survey the spread and note the preponderance of apple pie. The phrase "as American as apple pie" occurs to me, and I think: yeah, just like greed and sex - part of the American cultural fabric.
SexThis book I just read was all about how college students today deal with sexuality and spirituality, how they reconcile them (or rather... don't.) It was a fascinating (and sad) research project by Donna Freitas. She surveyed roughly 1,000 college students at various types of universities about their sexual practices and their religious practices and how they dealt with the two. The main question was: "are these two areas of your life integrated, distinct, or at odds?"
The answer is - no, not integrated (except in very rare cases). And the other two options break down cleanly by type of college. For students at Evangelical colleges (like Bethel), sex and religion interact constantly - because they are at war with each other!
For students at all other types of schools: private (like Macalester), Catholic (like Marquette) and public (like UW or U of M), the sex and religion spheres are deliberately kept separate - they have nothing to say to one another, no grounds on which to interact.
At Evangelical colleges the "purity culture" rules the day. Students are encouraged by their peers to NOT have sex, since it is seen as detrimental to relationship (with each other and with God).
At Catholic/private/public colleges the "hookup culture" rules the day. Students are pressured by their peers to have MORE sex, as hookups are seen as potentially opening the door to relationship development.
At Evangelical schools, sex is the enemy of religion and vice versa - it is a battle for purity, for both men and women.
At Catholic/private/public colleges, sex and religion don't mix. There is a sort of dissociative disorder that blocks recognition of one by the other in a person's life.
Interestingly, no interviewee who participated in the "hookup culture" actually LIKED it. Rather, they bemoaned the fact that it even exists, were personally disappointed in themselves and their participation in it, but shrugged and said "what can we do? It's how it is."
Similarly, no one embedded in the "purity culture" thought that it was a realistic or even ultimately a healthy view of sexuality (essentially denying that you are a sexual being for the sake your relationship with God and the larger religious community.) But at the same time, most Evangelical schools have no alternative to offer. Grace on THIS issue is hard to come by.
What both kinds of students have in common is this. They all:
1) invest highly in their spiritual identities (even if unaffiliated)
2) experience sexual desire, and long to act on that desire
3) highly value finding a
non-sexual, fulfilling romantic relationship
and
4) don't know how to reconcile items 1-3.
Basically, the book ends without solutions. It leaves us (and the students) in tension. All students agree that once married integration is more likely. The hard part is to integrate sexuality & religion... while sexually mature
and unmarried. How to do that is unknown.
GreedIt seems there is as much bemoaning in the press these days of Wall Street's "culture of greed" as there is of colleges' "hookup culture". What struck me yesterday is that the bemoaning is very one-sided.
We the people, in order to form a more perfect conscience, pretty much blame Big Finance (specifically) and Wall Street (generally) for the greed part. But we very conveniently forget that the "hookup" of borrowers and lenders is entirely consensual.
The borrowers are very interested in the lifestyle their peers are leading, and want what they have. Lenders merely take advantage of the borrowers' desire. Borrowers will go to bed with whichever lender most enhances their self-esteem and status by putting themselves in homes and cars that they can't afford.
We the people... are our own worst enemy. Greed 'R' Us, baby.
The borrowing populace complaining about the greed on Wall Street kind of reminds me of the girl who eagerly had unprotected sex with the highly desirable boy on whom she had an awful crush. She had a wonderful time and felt great about it - until she missed her period.
Then she has the audacity to blame the boy for getting her pregnant and "ruining her college and career" plans, when it was entirely consensual on both sides. She wanted him just as much as he did her. They both had options, one of which was to NOT "do this deal".
It's like the old Prairie Home Companion skit that had a Norwegian Lutheran pastor counseling a young college girl on her unplanned pregnancy: "Vell den, Yenny, if ya didn't vant to go to Minneapolis... den vy did ya get on da train?"
Borrowers don't expect an unplanned preg... I mean foreclosure, either. But if you leverage yourself right to the edge, and then unemployment strikes unexpectedly (as it did with me last year), there you sit facing the loss of your house, staring at bankruptcy because of your indebtedness.
Oops. Maybe I should have thought about that when his hot breath was on my neck and his whispers were urging me:
"no money down"
"introductory rate"
"interest only loan"
"a three year balloon"
"real estate appreciates"
Mmmhmm. Sure.
Except he didn't stick around for breakfast. Just came and went. :(
So, social commentator, did you go back for a second slice of pie?
Yes. Pecan just wasn't enough. Not with key lime also on the table.
Pecan: hearty, familiar, comforting.
Key Lime: creamy, exotic, refreshing.
Who can choose?
But I did stop at two.